effects of cavity design on clinical fracture of the amalgam restoration. by Phillips, Ralph W.

Cover of: effects of cavity design on clinical fracture of the amalgam restoration. | Phillips, Ralph W.

Published by School of Aviation Medicine, USAF Aerospace Medical Center (ATC) in Brooks AirForce Base .

Written in English

Read online

Book details

ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL13800581M

Download effects of cavity design on clinical fracture of the amalgam restoration.

Tech Doc Rep SAMTDR USAF Sch Aerosp Med. Dec; The effects of cavity design on clinical fracture of the amalgam : Phillips Rw. In the present in vitro study, the effects of cavity design and material type on the success of the restorations and fracture modes were evaluated in the primary teeth.

In the literature, most of the research on the successful restoration of class II cavities focused on composite restorative materials in permanent teeth (Laegreid et al., Cited by: 1. Resistance forms refer to the cavity design that prevents fracture of either the restoration or the tooth itself.

For example, amalgam is a brittle material and if used in thicknesses less than 2 mm it may undergo fracture under loads of mastication. Maintaining the integrity at the margins of the amalgam restoration is a primary goal of dentistry, and breakdown in this area leads to fracture of the restoration.

Although failure at the margins appears to be an inherent characteristic in the amalgam system, it can be controlled by modifying the cavity by: 1. L.G. Terkla, D.B. Mahler, Clinical evaluation of interproximal retention grooves in class II amalgam cavity design J Prosthet Dent () L.G. Terkla, D.B.

Mahler, J. Van Eysden, Analysis of amalgam cavity design J Prosthet Dent ()   However, clinical research by Terkia and Mahler" established that proximal retentive grooves did not prevent clinical fracture of the restoration.

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the influence of four types of axiopulpal line angles and proximal grooves on the fracture strength of amalgam restorations. Important Properties. The linear coefficient of the thermal expansion of amalgam is times greater than that of tooth structure, but it is closer than the linear coefficient of thermal expansion of composite.

Although the compressive strength of high-copper amalgam is similar to tooth structure, the tensile strength is lower, making amalgam restorations prone to fracture. 8,20,   • Hydrogen gases, accumulate, exert pressure- upto PSI.

• Protrusion of entire restoration outside cavity, increased microleakage space around restoration, restoration perforation, blister formation on restoration surface, increased flow & creep, pulpal pressure pain, delayed expansion- µ/cm3 • Clinical significance clinical effect of initial shrinkage.

initial linkage post-op sensitivity marginal fracture likely if cavity beveled. amalgam strength - Hg amount. too little Hg - weaker (non cohesive amalgam) - adaptation to cavity prep - cavity design - carving, finishing, and polishing - amalgam bonding.

forms of mercury. The effects of alloy, cavity width, and tooth position on failure rate at the margins of two-year-old Class II amalgams were analyzed. Interpretation of the results from a factorial design indicated that: (1) There were significant differences among alloys; (2) conservative preparations exhibit less breakdown than wider preparations; and (3) there was less failure in lower premolars than.

clinical applications (6). The aim of this study was to compare the fracture resistance of amalgam and posterior composite in premolar and molar teeth with abrasion.

Materials and methods Study design Sixty newly-extracted human, lower premolar and molar teeth were used. The teeth were extracted for periodontal, orthodontic or surgical reasons, and. The effect of variations in the design of class-II cavity preparations on the marginal degradation of amalgam restorations was included as a study aim in a clinical trial.

Four hundred and sixty-eight restorations were placed in patients by 7 Scandinavian dentists using 5 different alloys. The marginal degradation was scored on impressions of the restored teeth by means of a six-point.

II-Cavity preparation: More than 60% of failure may be due to improper cavity preparation. The design of the preparation affect the mechanical integrity of both the tooth and the restoration, the biological influences of the restoration on the dentino-pulpal organ and also has an important effect on the esthetic of the restoration.

4 5. The effect of width of the restoration, tooth position, and amalgam type on the fracture of the margins of to year-old, high-copper, amalgam restorations was evaluated. In conventional or traditional endodontic access cavity (TEC) preparation, the tooth structure is removed in a controlled manner to prevent endodontic complications.

5 However, loss of dentin and anatomical structures such as cusps, marginal ridges and pulp chamber floor can lead to tooth fracture after final restoration. 6,7 Unlike TEC, the.

new cavity design for luted restorations, Fig 22 Wide inadequate amalgam restoration. with residual and recurrent caries. An ex vivo study assessing the fracture resistance of ETT with. Key words: cavity wall thickness, fracture strength, p ulpotomized primary molar teeth, amalgam restoration Introduction Tooth substance loss can reduce fracture resistance due to dental caries and cavity preparation [Caron et al, ], especially in endodontically treated teeth with extensive (MOD) restorations [Linn and Messer, ; Panitvisai and Messer, ; Ortega et al, ].

Table compares factors related to restorative choices when choosing between amalgam and composite materials. An amalgam restoration requires a specific tooth preparation form that ensures (1) retention of the material within the tooth and (2) strength of the material in terms of bulk thickness and marginal edge strength.

as core build-ups for teeth that will be restored with crowns, Amalgam due to its high fracture toughness also would be suitable as a crown foundation The selection of the optimum core material depends on clinical judgment and the specific clinical situation.

Conversely, dental amalgam is recommended in Class II applications where: 1. The clinical diagnosis of secondary (recurrent) caries is the main reason for replacing amalgam restorations, with fracture being the second most common reason for amalgam restoration failure (Mjör, Moorhead & Dahl, ).

When secondary caries is diagnosed, it inevitably results in replacement of the restoration, but an alternative treatment. Class I Cavity Preparation for Amalgam Clinical Technique 1. Anesthesia (Pt comfort, decrease salivary flow). Occlusal assessment (determine design, adjust the restoration function).

Isolation (visibility, better restoration quality). Tooth preparation. Pulp Protection. The Casa Pia Study of the Health Effects of Dental Amalgams in Children was a randomized clinical trial designed to assess the safety of low-level mercury exposure attributable to dental amalgam restorations It began in as a col-laborative project between the University of Washington, Seattle; the University of Lisbon.

cate a new restoration or even require the extraction of the tooth. CLINICAL MANIFESTATION The cracked tooth syndrome is defined as the incom-plete fracture of the natural crown of a premolar or molar tooth.' Gibbs'* in was the first author to de-scribe an incomplete fracture in the dental literature, using the term cuspal fracture odontalgia.

Class of restoration: Occlusal (O), Proximal (P), Mesio-Occlusal-Distal (MOD) restorations. of restorative material: Amalgam or resin composite.

Design of the cavity preparation: The size of the restoration as a class was measured on the radiographs and models using a millimeter ruler (Staedtler, Nüremberg, Germany) with mm. The effect of variations in the design of class-II cavity preparations on the marginal degradation of amalgam restorations was included as a study aim in a clinical trial.

Four hundred and sixty-eight restorations were placed in patients by 7 Scandinavian dentists using 5 different alloys. of preparation design and its effect on the clinical success of ceramic inlays. Milleding et al.4 stated that ‘‘the effect of cavity design on the strength of an inlay is a factor that is probably underrated’’.

The main factors of preparation design that influence the longevity of the inlay⁄tooth complex are as follows. Increase the strength of amalgam.

Decrease the flow value of amalgam. Elimination of gamma phase 2. Reduce the conductivity of amalgam. Key: D Topic: Clinical Dental Materials In a cavity preparation cavo-surface margin will be junction between: A.

Cavity wall/ floor and adjacent tooth surface. Cavity wall and floor. disposes to fracture during shearing forces. A number of steps in the protocol of root-canal treatment have a negative effect on collagen including the use of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), with concentrations over 2% hav-ing more deleterious effects.

10 There is a syn - ergistic effect of ethylenediaminetetraacetic. When decay or fracture incorporate areas of a tooth that make amalgam or composite restorations inadequate, such as cuspal fracture or remaining tooth structure that undermines perimeter walls of a tooth, an onlay might be indicated.

Similar to an inlay, an onlay is an indirect restoration which incorporates a cusp or cusps by covering or onlaying the missing cusps. Results. Composite restorations showed significantly higher fracture resistance values compared to the amalgam group (P fracture resistance values compared to the dive group, whereas there was no significant difference between the control group and the flight group (P = ).No significant difference in the level of microleakage.

Clinical studies, however, have shown variable results and a recent systematic review has questioned the benefit of bonding amalgam. 10 Also, while a number of countries have banned amalgam11,12 or are in the process of doing so,13 there are many regions of the world that are unlikely to be able to do this due to resource or financial concerns.

The deleterious effects of the handpiece on the tooth along with the creation of the smear layer can result in problems with bonding and microleakage. The toxic effects of restorative materials themselves on the pulpal tissue has been well researched.9,10 In clinical practice, as soon as we cut into a tooth we have sentenced that tooth to a.

The fracture resistance of teeth can be decreased by cavities, trauma, erosion, aging, malocclusion, accidents, and caries [].In most cases, endodontically-treated teeth are more fragile due to non-conservative endodontic access cavity preparation, and removal of the arched roof of pulp chamber [2, 3].The success of endodontic treatment is based on coronal restorations that support the.

T or F:  The fracture resistance of teeth restored with amalgam-bonded MOD restorations was more than twice that of restorations containing un-bonded amalgams. True Are peak urine levels of mercury higher after placing or removing an amalgam. It was estimated that the replacement of failed restorations constituted about 60 percent of all operative works of dentists.

1 Survival rate has been used as a measure of clinical performance. 2 Therefore, how long the restoration could serve in oral cavity has been a concern in evidence-based dentistry.

Life expectancy of dental restorative. amalgam has high compressive strength (MPa for low-copper amalgam and MPa for high-copper amalgams). However, the tensile and shear strengths are comparatively low. Therefore, amalgam should be supported by tooth structures for clinical success in the long term.

The rate at which an amalgam develops strength is an important clinical. Table 2 shows the results of the assessment of the clinical performance of the amalgam and compomer restorations regarding retention, bulk fracture, and secondary caries at each examination. One amalgam restoration was lost and 1 compomer restoration presented secondary caries at the cervical margin after 24 months.

No bulk fracture was re. Describe key elements of adhesive preparation design for posterior composite resin restorations. Discuss methods of managing and minimizing stress in posterior composite restorations.

Disclosures: The author reports no conflicts of interest associated with this work. Purpose: This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of restorative materials and glass fiber post on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars.

Material and Methods: Fifty extracted single rooted lower premolars were used in this in vitro study and divided into 5 groups: sound teeth (control group); mesial-occlusal-distal (MOD) preparation + endodontic treatment + composite. The restoration of large cavities on posterior teeth with amalgam is a good option to recover the shape and function of the affected tooth.

Due to the restoration size, retention is the main concern, and different techniques are presented in this chapter about how to provide it in a natural and artificial way. In the current study, no influence of the two preparation designs on visible crack formation was found. Broderson22 describes the disadvantages for cavity design A, which create a high amount of stress points in the ceramic restoration and may lead to fracture.

This assumption cannot be backed up by the results of the current study. The third reason which leads to the failure in Class II cavity design is due to the fracture of the restoration which may be as a result of isthmus fracture or marginal ridge fracture. Due to improper cavity design with recurrent caries underlying amalgam restoration leading to fracture of the restoration.Figure 1: Tooth Clinical and bite-wing radiograph.

Figure 2: After the setting of the rubberdam, we procede to the removal of the temporary obturation, and the cavity preparation to receive the indirect restoration. It is important that the future restoration / tooth joint does not coincide with the occlusion impact points.

These contacts could.

17704 views Thursday, November 12, 2020